To Carry or Not to Carry: Pros and Cons

The issue of whether civilians should carry guns is one of the most contentious topics in contemporary society. This debate involves various factors, including public safety, constitutional rights, and personal protection. Here, we explore the primary arguments for and against civilian gun carry. At C2 we advocate concealed carry for those who are well-trained, understand the laws, and possess the wherewithal NOT to use lethal force when other options are available.

Argument For Civilian Gun Carry

Arguments for civilian carry covers many areas from constitutional rights to personal protection and self-defense.

Protection Against Crime

 One of the strongest arguments for civilian gun carry is the right to self-defense. Proponents argue that owning and carrying firearms can deter criminal activity and provide individuals with a means to protect themselves and their families in dangerous situations

Response to Immediate Threats

In situations where law enforcement response times are slow, having a firearm can be crucial. Firearms can provide a quick means of defense against immediate threats such as home invasions or assaults​​.

Constitutional Rights

The U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. Advocates argue that this right is fundamental to American liberty and that restrictions on civilian gun carry infringe upon this constitutional guarantee. The Supreme Court rulings in cases like District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) have reinforced the individual’s right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, including self-defense within the home​​.

Arguments Against Civilian Gun Carry

The sad reality is that many people who do carry are not particularly well trained, are often ignorant of the laws, and some even possess an attitude of “bring it on” rather than one of avoidance. This prompts arguments against concealed carry for civilians such as:

Increased Violence and Accidents

Critics argue that more guns in public spaces can lead to increased rates of gun violence and accidents. Research indicates that the presence of firearms can escalate conflicts and that states with higher gun ownership rates tend to have higher rates of gun deaths, including homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings​​.

Law Enforcement Concerns

Police officers and other law enforcement personnel often express concerns about the proliferation of guns, which can complicate their work and increase the risk of firearms-related incidents during routine interactions​.

Untrained Civilians

Unlike law enforcement officers, many civilians lack the training required to handle high-stress situations involving firearms. This lack of training can lead to poor decision-making and potentially tragic outcomes, including shooting innocent bystanders or escalating confrontations unnecessarily​​.

Final Thoughts

The debate over civilian gun carry is deeply complex, involving constitutional rights, public safety, and individual protection. Proponents emphasize the right to self-defense and constitutional guarantees, while opponents focus on the potential for increased violence and accidents.  Ultimately, finding common ground may require balancing the right to bear arms with measures designed to enhance public safety and ensure that firearms are carried responsibly and safely. Our recommendation is to become well trained, well-educated, and aware by attending C2’s CCW, firearms classes, and to train regularly in the SIM room, and on the range.

Area338 Back to Top